Melissa Ryan v. Loandepot, Inc.
This text of Melissa Ryan v. Loandepot, Inc. (Melissa Ryan v. Loandepot, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. 2:24-cv-03630-DOC-JDEx Date: May 29, 2024
Title: Melissa Ryan v. Loandepot, Inc.
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Karlen Dubon Not Present Courtroom Clerk Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: DEFENDANT: None Present None Present
PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER CONSOLIDATING AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE
The Court previously issued an order to show cause why this case should not be consolidated with a related case. See Order to Show Cause (dkt. 13). The deadline for Plaintiff to respond has passed, and she has not responded. The Court construes Plaintiff’s failure to respond to the Order as a concession that consolidation is warranted. See Ramirez v. Ghilotti Bros. Inc., 941 F. Supp. 2d 1197, 1210 (N.D. Cal. 2013) (holding that not responding to an argument constitutes a concession of the issue).
Accordingly, the Court ORDERS this case be consolidated with Daroya Isaiah v. loanDepot, Inc. (8:24-cv-00136-DOC-JDE). This case shall be administratively closed, and all future filings, including a new request for clerk to issue summons, shall be made under 8:24- cv-00136-DOC-JDE.
The Clerk shall serve this minute order on the parties.
MINUTES FORM 11 Initials of Deputy Clerk: kdu CIVIL-GEN
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Melissa Ryan v. Loandepot, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melissa-ryan-v-loandepot-inc-cacd-2024.