Melissa Reyna Rogers v. Rancefer James Rogers

Court of Appeals of Texas

Melissa Reyna Rogers v. Rancefer James Rogers

DecidedApril 9, 2020

Docket11-19-00213-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Melissa Reyna Rogers v. Rancefer James Rogers (Melissa Reyna Rogers v. Rancefer James Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Melissa Reyna Rogers v. Rancefer James Rogers, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

Order filed April 9, 2020

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-19-00213-CV __________

MELISSA REYNA ROGERS, Appellant V. RANCEFER JAMES ROGERS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 446th District Court Ector County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. C-137,562

ORDER Appellant has filed in this court her third pro se motion for extension of time to file her appellate brief. Appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on or before September 5, 2019. We note that this is the sixth request for an extension of time to file the appellant’s brief in this appeal; Appellant’s previous attorney filed three before he withdrew. The delay in filing Appellant’s brief in this cause is unacceptable, and it has unduly delayed the timely disposition of this appeal. In the correspondence granting the previous motion for extension, we provided as follows: “Further motions for extension of time will not be accepted. If Appellant’s brief is not filed by April 3, 2020, the appeal will be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution.” In the most recent motion, Appellant indicates that the COVID-19 pandemic has now hindered her ability to draft a pro se brief or find someone to help with the brief. After considering the motion and the extraordinary situation of the COVID- 19 pandemic, we are of the opinion that the motion should be granted in part and that the appeal should be abated for sixty days. Accordingly, this appeal is abated until June 8, 2020, at which time the appeal will be reinstated. Appellant’s brief will be due to be filed in this court on or before July 8, 2020. If Appellant’s brief is not filed by July 8, 2020, the appeal will be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution.

PER CURIAM

April 9, 2020 Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.1

Willson, J., not participating.

1 Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, sitting by assignment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order filed April 9, 2020

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-19-00213-CV __________

MELISSA REYNA ROGERS, Appellant V. RANCEFER JAMES ROGERS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 446th District Court Ector County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. C-137,562

ORDER Appellant has filed in this court her third pro se motion for extension of time to file her appellate brief. Appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on or before September 5, 2019. We note that this is the sixth request for an extension of time to file the appellant’s brief in this appeal; Appellant’s previous attorney filed three before he withdrew. The delay in filing Appellant’s brief in this cause is unacceptable, and it has unduly delayed the timely disposition of this appeal. In the correspondence granting the previous motion for extension, we provided as follows: “Further motions for extension of time will not be accepted. If Appellant’s brief is not filed by April 3, 2020, the appeal will be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution.” In the most recent motion, Appellant indicates that the COVID-19 pandemic has now hindered her ability to draft a pro se brief or find someone to help with the brief. After considering the motion and the extraordinary situation of the COVID- 19 pandemic, we are of the opinion that the motion should be granted in part and that the appeal should be abated for sixty days. Accordingly, this appeal is abated until June 8, 2020, at which time the appeal will be reinstated. Appellant’s brief will be due to be filed in this court on or before July 8, 2020. If Appellant’s brief is not filed by July 8, 2020, the appeal will be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution.

PER CURIAM

April 9, 2020 Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.1

Willson, J., not participating.

1 Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, sitting by assignment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Melissa Reyna Rogers v. Rancefer James Rogers, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melissa-reyna-rogers-v-rancefer-james-rogers-texapp-2020.