Melissa Danielle Sinclair v. Seth D. Sinclair
This text of Melissa Danielle Sinclair v. Seth D. Sinclair (Melissa Danielle Sinclair v. Seth D. Sinclair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
MELISSA DANIELLE SINCLAIR NO. 2021 CW 0655
VERSUS
SETH D. SINCLAIR JULY 30, 2021
In Re: Seth D. Sinclair, applying for supervisory writs,
Family Court in and for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 210952.
BEFORE: THERIOT, HOLDRIDGE, AND HESTER, JJ.
WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. This writ application is untimely. Relator' s notice of intent was filed on May 6, 2021, more than
thirty days after the trial court signed a judgment on January 6, 2021 denying relator' s motion to homologate and granting plaintiff' s motion for partial judgment on the pleadings.
Although relator filed a motion for new trial following entry of the January 6, 2021 interlocutory judgment, a motion for new
trial pertains only to final judgments and was procedurally improper. Most significantly, the filing of a motion for new
trial seeking interlocutory reconsideration judgment of an
cannot interrupt the thirty -day period for filing an application for supervisory writs established by Rule 4- 3 of the Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal. Finally, we note that relator does not seek review of the denial of the motion for new trial. Carter v. Rhea, 2001- 0234 ( La. App. 4th Cir. 4/ 25/ 01), 785 So. 2d 1022, 1025.
MRT GH CHH
DEPUTY LERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Melissa Danielle Sinclair v. Seth D. Sinclair, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melissa-danielle-sinclair-v-seth-d-sinclair-lactapp-2021.