Melissa Azrack, etc. v. In Re: Estate of Malcolm Joel Dorman

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 10, 2024
Docket2023-0478
StatusPublished

This text of Melissa Azrack, etc. v. In Re: Estate of Malcolm Joel Dorman (Melissa Azrack, etc. v. In Re: Estate of Malcolm Joel Dorman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Melissa Azrack, etc. v. In Re: Estate of Malcolm Joel Dorman, (Fla. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed January 10, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-478 Lower Tribunal No. 21-2070

Melissa Azrack, etc., Appellant,

vs.

In Re: Estate of Malcolm Joel Dorman, Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose L. Fernandez, Judge.

Barry S. Franklin & Associates, P.A. and Barry S. Franklin, for appellant.

Kluger, Kaplan, Silverman, Katzen and Levine, P.L., Bruce A. Katzken, and Lauren S. Fallick; Samson Appellate Law and Daniel M. Samson, for appellees.

Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 742.10(1), Fla. Stat. (2023) (“[A] notarized voluntary

acknowledgment of paternity or voluntary acknowledgment of paternity . . .

creates a rebuttable presumption, as defined by s. 90.304, of paternity and is

subject to the right of any signatory to rescind the acknowledgment within 60

days after the date the acknowledgment was signed . . . .”); Giller v. Giller,

190 So. 3d 666, 669 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (“Personal Representatives are duly

appointed legal representatives of the Estate, with the capacity to bring an

action on the Estate's behalf and charged with the obligation to take

possession of [the decedent’s] property for purposes of

administration.”); Magwood v. Tate, 835 So. 2d 1241, 1243 (Fla. 4th DCA

2003) (“[A] personal representative of an estate stands in the shoes of the

decedent, so a person has no greater rights against the estate than the

person would have had against the decedent during his lifetime.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Magwood v. Tate
835 So. 2d 1241 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Giller and Grossman v. Giller
190 So. 3d 666 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Melissa Azrack, etc. v. In Re: Estate of Malcolm Joel Dorman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melissa-azrack-etc-v-in-re-estate-of-malcolm-joel-dorman-fladistctapp-2024.