Melinda Candanosa v. FEC Euless, L.P., Individually, and D/B/A America's Incredible Pizza Company
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-11-00056-CV
MELINDA CANDANOSA APPELLANT
V.
FEC EULESS, L.P., INDIVIDUALLY, APPELLEE AND D/B/A AMERICA'S INCREDIBLE PIZZA COMPANY
----------
FROM THE 67TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 ---------- On February 10, 2011, Appellant Melinda Candanosa filed a notice of
appeal from the trial court’s judgment, which was signed on January 10, 2011.
On February 16, 2011, we sent a letter to Appellant stating our concern that we
may be without jurisdiction because Appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. filed.2 We informed Appellant that unless she, or any party desiring to continue
the appeal, filed a response showing a reasonable explanation for the late filing
of the notice of appeal on or before February 28, 2011, the appeal could be
dismissed for want of jurisdiction. To date, we have received no response
showing any reasonable explanation for the late filing of the notice of appeal.
The January 10, 2011 order of the trial court was a final judgment and
appealable. Thus, the notice of appeal must have been filed by February 9,
2011, but it was not filed until February 10, 2011. Because Appellant’s notice of
appeal was untimely, we have no jurisdiction to consider this appeal.
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.3
PER CURIAM
PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.
DELIVERED: April 7, 2011
2 See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a). 3 See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Melinda Candanosa v. FEC Euless, L.P., Individually, and D/B/A America's Incredible Pizza Company (Melinda Candanosa v. FEC Euless, L.P., Individually, and D/B/A America's Incredible Pizza Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.