Melinda Birt v. Surface Transportation Board, Union Pacific Railroad Company and City of Nampa, Idaho, Intervenors
98 F.3d 644, 321 U.S. App. D.C. 195, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 28948, 1996 WL 635188
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided November 5, 1996·No. 95-1211·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinions
ORDER
Upon consideration of petitioner’s Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc, the response thereto, and the absence of a request by any member of the court for a vote, it is
ORDERED by the court that the suggestion be denied.
A statement of Circuit Judge SENTELLE concurring in the denial of rehearing in banc, joined by Circuit Judges SILBERMAN, STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS and GINSBURG, is attached.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Melinda Birt v. Surface Transportation Board, Union Pacific Railroad Company and City of Nampa, Idaho, Intervenors, 98 F.3d 644, 321 U.S. App. D.C. 195, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 28948, 1996 WL 635188 (D.C. Cir. 1996).
98 F.3d 644 (Melinda Birt v. Surface Transportation Board, Union Pacific Railroad Company and City of Nampa, Idaho, Intervenors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Beres v. States
64 Fed. Cl. 403 (Federal Claims, 2005)
Owens v. United States
688 A.2d 399 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1996)
Melinda Birt v. Surface Transportation Board, Union Pacific Railroad Company and City of Nampa, Idaho, Intervenors
98 F.3d 644 (D.C. Circuit, 1996)