Melillo v. Coughlin

104 A.D.2d 686, 479 N.Y.S.2d 485, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20101

This text of 104 A.D.2d 686 (Melillo v. Coughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Melillo v. Coughlin, 104 A.D.2d 686, 479 N.Y.S.2d 485, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20101 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

— Application, pursuant to CPLR 5704 (subd [a]) to review an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term which denied an ex parte petition and dismissed the proceedings against respondents on [687]*687the merits. Application granted, and order dated April 13, 1984 vacated. Based upon our review of the original petition, we are of the opinion that it is not patently frivolous or without some merit. Accordingly, the matter is remitted to Special Term for the issuance of an order to show cause authorizing commencement of this proceeding by such service as Special Term deems appropriate (see Matter of King v Gregorie, 90 AD2d 922, mot for lv to app dsmd 58 NY2d 822). Kane, J. P., Main, Casey, Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

King v. Gregorie
445 N.E.2d 653 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
King v. Gregorie
90 A.D.2d 922 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 A.D.2d 686, 479 N.Y.S.2d 485, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melillo-v-coughlin-nyappdiv-1984.