Melgar v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Melgar v. State

476 S.W.3d 930, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1303, 2015 WL 8776738

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 15, 2015

DocketWD 78129

StatusPublished

This text of 476 S.W.3d 930 (Melgar v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Melgar v. State, 476 S.W.3d 930, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1303, 2015 WL 8776738 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Per curiam:

Carlos Melgar was convicted by a Pettis County jury- of one count of first-degree assault, one count of armed' criminal action, and one count of unlawful use of a weapon. Melgar’s post-conviction motion argued that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call a certain witness to testify on his behalf. Following an evidentiary hearing, Meglar’s post-conviction motion was denied. We affirm. A memorandum explaining our decision has been provided to thé parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Per curiam:

Carlos Melgar was convicted by a Pettis County jury- of one count of first-degree assault, one count of armed' criminal action, and one count of unlawful use of a weapon. Melgar’s post-conviction motion argued that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call a certain witness to testify on his behalf. Following an evidentiary hearing, Meglar’s post-conviction motion was denied. We affirm. A memorandum explaining our decision has been provided to thé parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

476 S.W.3d 930, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1303, 2015 WL 8776738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melgar-v-state-moctapp-2015.