Meletrich v. Comm'r of Corr.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Meletrich v. Comm'r of Corr.

178 A.3d 1041, 328 Conn. 908

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedFebruary 7, 2018

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 178 A.3d 1041 (Meletrich v. Comm'r of Corr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meletrich v. Comm'r of Corr., 178 A.3d 1041, 328 Conn. 908 (Colo. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

The petitioner Angel Meletrich's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 178 Conn. App. 266, 174 A.3d 824 (2017), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that (a) trial counsel's failure to call the petitioner's aunt as an alibi witness was reasonable trial strategy and therefore not ineffective assistance of counsel, and (b) such failure did not prejudice the petitioner?"

ROBINSON, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petitioner Angel Meletrich's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 178 Conn. App. 266, 174 A.3d 824 (2017), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that (a) trial counsel's failure to call the petitioner's aunt as an alibi witness was reasonable trial strategy and therefore not ineffective assistance of counsel, and (b) such failure did not prejudice the petitioner?"

ROBINSON, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

178 A.3d 1041, 328 Conn. 908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meletrich-v-commr-of-corr-conn-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack