Melesio Morales-Mata v. Eric Holder, Jr.

497 F. App'x 761
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedNovember 16, 2012
Docket11-71141
StatusUnpublished

This text of 497 F. App'x 761 (Melesio Morales-Mata v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Melesio Morales-Mata v. Eric Holder, Jr., 497 F. App'x 761 (9th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Melesio Morales-Mata, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s continuous physical presence determination, Lopez-Alvarado v. Ashcroft, 381 F.3d 847, 850-51 (9th Cir.2004), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s conclusion that Morales-Mata’s inconsistent testimonial evidence was insufficient to meet his burden of proving ten years of continuous physical presence in the United States. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(A); cf. Lopez-Alvarado, 381 F.3d at 851-53 (finding that petitioners had met their burden where the detailed documentary and testimonial evidence presented by petitioners was consistent).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
497 F. App'x 761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melesio-morales-mata-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2012.