Melendy v. Capen
120 Mass. 222, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 160
Opinion
The contract sued on clearly appears upon its face to have been intended to be a continuing guaranty. Bent v. Hartshorn, 1 Met. 24. Hatch v. Hobbs, 12 Gray, 447. Boston & Sandwich Glass Co. v. Moore, 119 Mass. 435. The question of fact of extinguishment or discharge has been decided by the court below in favor of the plaintiffs.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Melendy v. Capen, 120 Mass. 222, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 160 (Mass. 1876).
120 Mass. 222 (Melendy v. Capen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bradshaw v. Sibert
158 N.W. 830 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1916)
Sullivan v. Arcand
43 N.E. 198 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1896)
Cutler v. Ballou
136 Mass. 337 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1884)
Crittenden v. Fiske
8 N.W. 714 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1881)