Melendez v. New York Univ.
This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 32803(U) (Melendez v. New York Univ.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Melendez v New York Univ. 2025 NY Slip Op 32803(U) August 15, 2025 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 158225/2021 Judge: Mary V. Rosado Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. INDEX NO. 158225/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 146 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/15/2025
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. MARY V. ROSADO PART 33M Justice ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----X INDEX NO. 158225/2021 WILLIE MELENDEZ, MOTION DATE 05/15/2025 Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. 003 - V -
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY, TURNER CONSTRUCTION DECISION + ORDER ON COMPANY, MOTION Defendant ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY, TURNER CONSTRUCTION Third-Party COMPANY Index No. 595288/2025
Plaintiff,
-against-
ADCO ELECTRICAL CORP.
Defendant. --------- -- ----- ---------------------------------------------------------------X
The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 003) 108, 109, 110, 111, 112,113,114,115,116,117,118,122,131,132,133,13 4,135,136,137,138,144 were read on this motion to/for SEVER
Upon the foregoing documents, and after a final submission date of August 1, 2025, Third-
Party Defendant Adco Electrical Corp. 's ("Adco") motion to dismiss Defendants/Third-Party
Plaintiffs New York University and Turner Construction Company's (collectively "Third-Party
Plaintiffs") Third-Party Complaint, or alternatively to sever the third-party action, is granted in
part and denied in part.
This action was commenced via summons and Complaint on September 3, 2021 (NYSCEF
Doc. 1). The preliminary conference was held on August 24, 2022 (NYSCEF Doc. 14). Several
compliance and status conferences took place in the following years, and on January 23, 2025,
158225/2021 MELENDEZ, WILLIE vs. NEW YORK UNIVERSITY ET AL Page 1 of 4 Motion No. 003
1 of 4 [* 1] INDEX NO. 158225/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 146 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/15/2025
Plaintiff filed the note of issue (NYSCEF Doc. 64). It was not until March 18, 2025, that Third-
Party Plaintiffs filed the Third-Party Complaint which is the subject of the instant motion
(NYSCEF Doc. 90). On May 15, 2025, Adco appeared and moved to dismiss the Third-Party
Action, or, alternatively, to sever it. Given the years long delay in impleading Adco, and because
the note of issue was filed several months prior to the filing of the Third-Party Complaint, the
Court finds there is ample reason to sever the third-party action from the main action.
Third-Party Plaintiffs never put the Court on notice of their intention to file a third-party
action despite years of case management conferences, and Third-Party Plaintiffs have proffered
no reasonable excuse for their years-long delay in filing the Third-Party Action. Third-Party
Plaintiffs admit they knew about Adco's existence and Adco's alleged responsibility to indemnify
or insure Third-Party Plaintiffs by March 26, 2024 the latest, as that is the date Third-Party
Plaintiffs sent a tender letter to Adco and its insurer (NYSCEF Doc. 133). There is no excuse,
therefore, why Third-Party Plaintiffs waited another year before initiating the Third-Party Action.
Nor do the Third-Party Plaintiffs explain why despite taking Plaintiffs deposition in May and July
of 2023, they waited approximately two years to initiate a third-party complaint based on a theory
that Adco caused or contributed to Plaintiffs accident. Further, at this point the note of issue has
been filed and the only further discovery allowed is limited post-note of issue discovery related to
Plaintiffs medical condition.
Given this posture, the Court finds that allowing the Third-Party Complaint to stand would
be unduly prejudicial to Plaintiff in delaying his trial (see, e.g. WVH Housing Dev. Fund Corp. v
Brooklyn Insulation and Soundproofing, Inc., 193 AD3d 523, 523-24 [1st Dept 2021]; Maron v
Magnetic Const. Group Corp., 128 AD3d 426,427 [1st Dept 2015]; Torres v Cisto Realty Corp.,
106 AD3d 645 [1st Dept 2013]). It would also prejudice Adco, who was brought into this action
158225/2021 MELENDEZ, WILLIE vs. NEW YORK UNIVERSITY ET AL Page 2 of 4 Motion No. 003
2 of 4 [* 2] INDEX NO. 158225/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 146 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/15/2025
after years of discovery (Lopez v Halletts Astoria LLC, 205 AD3d 573, 574 [1st Dept 2022]). Nor
is there any risk of inconsistent verdicts as Adco's liability is contingent on a finding of liability
against Defendants/Third Party Plaintiffs (see also Admiral Indem. Co. v Popular Plumbing &
Heating Corp., 127 AD3d 419 [1st Dept 2015]). Therefore, Adco's motion to sever is granted.
However, Adco has not provided sufficient basis to dismiss Third-Party Plaintiffs Third-Party
Complaint. Therefore, that portion of the motion is denied.
Accordingly, it is hereby,
ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion to sever the Third-Party Complaint is granted, and the
Third-Party Action bearing Index No. 595288/2025 is severed from the main action bearing Index
No. 158225/2021; and it is further
ORDERED that within ten days of entry, Third-Party Defendant Adco Electrical Corp.
shall serve a copy of this order with notice of entry on the Clerk of this Court (60 Centre Street,
Room 141B); and it is further
ORDERED that Third-Party Defendant Adco Electrical Corp. shall serve a copy of this
Decision and Order with notice of entry on all parties in this action via NYSCEF, and shall serve
notice of entry on the office of the General Clerk in accordance with the procedures set forth in
the Protocol on Courthouse and County Clerk Procedures for Electronically Filed Cases
(accessible at the "E-Filing" page on the court's website), and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, upon service of a copy of this order with notice of
entry, shall sever the Third-Party Action bearing Index No. 595288/2025 from the main action
bearing Index No. 158225/2021, and the Clerk of the Court shall record such action in the Clerk's
records; and it is further
158225/2021 MELENDEZ, WILLIE vs. NEW YORK UNIVERSITY ET AL Page 3 of 4 Motion No. 003
3 of 4 [* 3] INDEX NO. 158225/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 146 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/15/2025
ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall amend the caption to remove the Third-Party
Action; and it is further
ORDERED that to the extent Third-Party Defendant Adco Electrical Corp. seeks dismissal
of the Third-Party Complaint, that portion of the motion is denied; and it is further
ORDRED that within ten days of entry, counsel for Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this
Decision and Order, with notice of entry, on all parties via NYSCEF.
This constitutes the Decision and Order of the Court.
8/15/2025 DATE
CHECK ONE: CASE DISPOSED x NON-FINAL DISPOSITION
GRANTED □ DENIED x GRANTED IN PART □ OTHER APPLICATION: SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER
CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT □ REFERENCE
158225/2021 MELENDEZ, WILLIE vs. NEW YORK UNIVERSITY ET AL Page 4 of 4 Motion No. 003
4 of 4 [* 4]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2025 NY Slip Op 32803(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melendez-v-new-york-univ-nysupctnewyork-2025.