Melendez v. Melendez

242 A.D.2d 918, 665 N.Y.S.2d 365, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10487
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 30, 1997·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We reject respondent’s contention that the determination changing physical custody of the parties’ daughter from respondent to petitioner lacks a sound and substantial basis in the record (see, White v White, 209 AD2d 949, lv dismissed 85 NY2d 924; Fox v Fox, 177 AD2d 209, 211-212). Upon our review of the record, we conclude that petitioner met his burden of showing that the change of custody is in the child’s best interests (see, Matter of Ammann v Ammann, 209 AD2d 1032; see also, Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167, 171-174). (Appeal from Order of Wyoming County Family Court, Griffith, J.—Custody.) Present—Denman, P. J., Hayes, Callahan, Doerr and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Melendez v. Melendez, 242 A.D.2d 918, 665 N.Y.S.2d 365, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10487 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

242 A.D.2d 918 (Melendez v. Melendez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schattinger v. Schattinger
256 A.D.2d 1209 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)