Melendez v. Hospital for Joint Diseases Orthopedic Institute

179 A.D.2d 610
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 30, 1992
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 179 A.D.2d 610 (Melendez v. Hospital for Joint Diseases Orthopedic Institute) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Melendez v. Hospital for Joint Diseases Orthopedic Institute, 179 A.D.2d 610 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

Defendant Howard Katz was an orthopedic resident employed by Bronx-Lebanon Hospital and assigned to a residency program at the Hospital For Joint Diseases when plaintiff’s decedent, who was a patient at the hospital, died of respiratory failure. Following commencement of a non-jury malpractice/wrongful death action, Bronx-Lebanon Hospital’s professional malpractice insurance manager, United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York (FOJP), settled with plaintiff on behalf of all defendants, including Dr. Katz, in the amount of $325,000, allocating 25% of liability to defendant Katz. Defendant Katz unsuccessfully moved to have the settlement set aside as to him on the ground that he never consented to the settlement.

While defendant’s residency agreement with Bronx-Leba[611]*611non, which required that he be covered by the hospital’s professional liability plan, is silent as to whether his consent to a settlement is required, FOJP presented unchallenged, evidentiary proof that defendant’s consent was not required pursuant to custom and practice in this area. Moreover, since Bronx-Lebanon through FOJP provided for an internal dispute resolution mechanism, which the defendant failed to exhaust before seeking judicial relief, he was correctly held to be precluded from seeking such relief (see, Madden v Atkins, 4 NY2d 283, 291; Morgan v New York Racing Assn., 72 AD2d 740).

Accordingly, defendant’s claim that the absence of his consent precludes any settlement on his behalf is without merit. Concur — Carro, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Smith, JJ. [See, 152 Misc 2d 286.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ironshore Europe Dac v. Schiff Hardin, LLP
284 F. Supp. 3d 845 (E.D. Texas, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
179 A.D.2d 610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melendez-v-hospital-for-joint-diseases-orthopedic-institute-nyappdiv-1992.