Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Melendez v. Barbulescu

Melendez v. Barbulescu

228 A.D.2d 420, 643 N.Y.2d 419, 643 N.Y.S.2d 419, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6215
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 3, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 228 A.D.2d 420 (Melendez v. Barbulescu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Melendez v. Barbulescu, 228 A.D.2d 420, 643 N.Y.2d 419, 643 N.Y.S.2d 419, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6215 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

[421]*421We find no merit to the appellant’s contention that the Supreme Court erred in apportioning the legal fees in this case without holding an evidentiary hearing. Both the appellant and the plaintiffs’ current attorney submitted evidence in support of their respective contentions, thereby providing the Supreme Court with an ample basis to render a determination (see, Rondinelli v Yabuki, 224 AD2d 404). Balletta, J. P., Rosenblatt, Thompson and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boddie-Willis v. Marziliano
78 A.D.3d 978 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
DeLorenzo v. Perlman
304 A.D.2d 827 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Tverskaya v. Avis Corp.
303 A.D.2d 492 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
228 A.D.2d 420, 643 N.Y.2d 419, 643 N.Y.S.2d 419, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melendez-v-barbulescu-nyappdiv-1996.