Mele v. Waterbury Co.

164 A.D. 954, 149 N.Y.S. 1096

This text of 164 A.D. 954 (Mele v. Waterbury Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mele v. Waterbury Co., 164 A.D. 954, 149 N.Y.S. 1096 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

Order reversed,, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, to the extent of giving plaintiff, accompanied by not more than two persons, an inspection of the machine by which he claims to have been hurt, together' with its equipment and appurtenances; that such persons be permitted to examine during business hours such machine, both in operation and at rest, and to take a photograph of the same; that plaintiff give in writing notice to defendant’s attorneys, two days before such inspection, of the day and hour when the same will be had, and that at the time named such inspection and photograph be made within a period not exceeding fifteen minutes. (See Pasuk v. American Manufacturing Co., 160 App. Div. 909.) Burr, Thomas, Carr, Rich and Stapleton, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pasuk v. American Manufacturing Co.
160 A.D. 909 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 A.D. 954, 149 N.Y.S. 1096, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mele-v-waterbury-co-nyappdiv-1914.