Mele v. Tinelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mele v. Tinelli

93 A.D.2d 979, 461 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17885

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 1, 1983

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 93 A.D.2d 979 (Mele v. Tinelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mele v. Tinelli, 93 A.D.2d 979, 461 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17885 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and action restored to calendar for Supreme Court, Oneida County. Memorandum: Family Court has no jurisdiction to enforce a separation agreement as such (see Iseman v Iseman, 48 AD2d 809, app dsmd 37 NY2d 918; “Manheim” v “Manheim”, 200 Misc 802, 806; Besharov, Practice Commentary, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 29A, 1976-1982, Supp Pamph, Family Ct Act, § 411, p 71). Accordingly, Trial Term erred in transferring to Family Court plaintiff’s plenary action on the contract for the recovery of arrears under a separation agreement. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, McKennan, J. — refer to Family Court.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Doerr, Denman and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and action restored to calendar for Supreme Court, Oneida County. Memorandum: Family Court has no jurisdiction to enforce a separation agreement as such (see Iseman v Iseman, 48 AD2d 809, app dsmd 37 NY2d 918; “Manheim” v “Manheim”, 200 Misc 802, 806; Besharov, Practice Commentary, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 29A, 1976-1982, Supp Pamph, Family Ct Act, § 411, p 71). Accordingly, Trial Term erred in transferring to Family Court plaintiff’s plenary action on the contract for the recovery of arrears under a separation agreement. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, McKennan, J. — refer to Family Court.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Doerr, Denman and Moule, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 A.D.2d 979, 461 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mele-v-tinelli-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack