Melczer v. Commissioner

63 F.2d 1010, 12 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 358, 1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 3716, 12 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 358
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 7, 1933
DocketNo. 6713
StatusPublished

This text of 63 F.2d 1010 (Melczer v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Melczer v. Commissioner, 63 F.2d 1010, 12 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 358, 1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 3716, 12 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 358 (9th Cir. 1933).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon oral motion of counsel for respondent, and it appearing that petition for writ of certiorari has been denied in the cause of O’Shaughnessy v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 60 F.(2d) 235, it is ordered that petition to review be dismissed because of denial of said petition, and for failure of petitioner to file brief as required by Rule 24.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

O'SHAUGHNESSY v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
60 F.2d 235 (Sixth Circuit, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 F.2d 1010, 12 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 358, 1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 3716, 12 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melczer-v-commissioner-ca9-1933.