Melchor Jesus B. Acosta, M.D. v. Gina Kay, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Tamsey Lynora Moore

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 3, 2011·No. 02-11-00396-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00396-CV

MELCHOR JESUS B. ACOSTA, APPELLANT M.D.

V.

GINA KAY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS APPELLEES REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF TAMSEY LYNORA MOORE, DECEASED

------------

FROM THE 48TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

We have considered the parties= AJoint Motion To Dismiss,@ requesting

that we render judgment to effectuate their settlement agreement, abate this

case until the trial court’s proceedings to effectuate the settlement agreement are

complete, and remand this case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. accordance with the parties’ agreement. It is the court=s opinion that the motion

should be granted in part and denied in part.2 Accordingly, without regard to the

merits, we set aside the trial court=s judgment and remand this case to the trial

court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties= settlement

agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B), 43.2(d); Innovative Office Sys.,

Inc. v. Johnson, 911 S.W.2d 387, 388 (Tex. 1995).

Appellant’s request that this appeal be joined with appellate cause number

02-11-00365-CV, styled TRISUN Healthcare, LLC d/b/a The Plaza At Mansfield

v. Gina Kay, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Tamsey Lynora

Moore, Deceased, is dismissed as moot. All other requested relief is denied.

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: November 3, 2011

2 That is, the parties ask us to render judgment effectuating the parties= agreement and to abate this case until the trial court’s proceedings to effectuate this settlement agreement are complete and to remand this case to the trial court for rendition of judgment. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A), (B), (C). Rule 42.1(a)(2), however, permits us to render judgment effectuating the parties= agreement or to set aside the trial court=s judgment and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the agreement or to abate the appeal and permit proceedings in the trial court to effectuate the agreement; we cannot do all three or portions of all three. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A), (B); see also Cunningham v. Cunningham, No. 02-08-00362-CV, 2008 WL 5479677, at *1 n.2 (Tex. App.CFort Worth Oct. 30, 2008, no pet.) (mem. op.).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Melchor Jesus B. Acosta, M.D. v. Gina Kay, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Tamsey Lynora Moore, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Melchor Jesus B. Acosta, M.D. v. Gina Kay, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Tamsey Lynora Moore (Melchor Jesus B. Acosta, M.D. v. Gina Kay, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Tamsey Lynora Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Innovative Office System, Inc. v. Johnson
911 S.W.2d 387 (Texas Supreme Court, 1995)