Melburn v. Louisiana Const. & Imp. Co.

Fifth Circuit

Melburn v. Louisiana Const. & Imp. Co.

62 F. 753, 10 C.C.A. 681, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2342

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMay 22, 1894

DocketNo. 221

StatusPublished

This text of 62 F. 753 (Melburn v. Louisiana Const. & Imp. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Melburn v. Louisiana Const. & Imp. Co., 62 F. 753, 10 C.C.A. 681, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2342 (5th Cir. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

PARDEE, Circuit Judge.

This appeal raises only the question of whethei wharfage dues, under the contract of the Louisiana Construction & Improvement Company with the city of New Orleans, of date May 23, 1891, should be charged and collected upon the gross or the net tonnage of the vessels using the wharf. For the reasons given in the case of Coul v. Improyement Co. (just decided) 02 Fed. 749, this case is ruled the samo way, and the decree appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PARDEE, Circuit Judge.

This appeal raises only the question of whethei wharfage dues, under the contract of the Louisiana Construction & Improvement Company with the city of New Orleans, of date May 23, 1891, should be charged and collected upon the gross or the net tonnage of the vessels using the wharf. For the reasons given in the case of Coul v. Improyement Co. (just decided) 02 Fed. 749, this case is ruled the samo way, and the decree appealed from is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 F. 753, 10 C.C.A. 681, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melburn-v-louisiana-const-imp-co-ca5-1894.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack