Home/Michigan Supreme Court/Melbourne v. LAWN WORKS

Melbourne v. LAWN WORKS

738 N.W.2d 231
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided September 21, 2007·No. 133658·Published

Opinion

738 N.W.2d 231 (2007)

Lola MELBOURNE, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
LAWN WORKS, Defendant, and
Wayne Bowling and Recreation, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.
Lola Melbourne, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Wayne Bowling and Recreation, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.

Docket Nos. 133658, 133659. COA Nos. 263783, 263819.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 21, 2007.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 6, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Melbourne v. LAWN WORKS, 738 N.W.2d 231 (Mich. 2007).

738 N.W.2d 231 (Melbourne v. LAWN WORKS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.