Melbourne v. LAWN WORKS
738 N.W.2d 231
This text of 738 N.W.2d 231 (Melbourne v. LAWN WORKS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Melbourne v. LAWN WORKS, 738 N.W.2d 231 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
Lola MELBOURNE, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
LAWN WORKS, Defendant, and
Wayne Bowling and Recreation, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.
Lola Melbourne, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Wayne Bowling and Recreation, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 6, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
738 N.W.2d 231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melbourne-v-lawn-works-mich-2007.