Melanie Fletcher v. Larry Branch
This text of Melanie Fletcher v. Larry Branch (Melanie Fletcher v. Larry Branch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-26-00201-CV ___________________________
MELANIE FLETCHER, Appellant
V.
LARRY BRANCH, Appellee
On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2026-002184-1
Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Birdwell, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth MEMORANDUM OPINION
When a “trial court clerk fail[s] to file the clerk’s record because the appellant
[has] failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee . . . , the appellate court
may—on . . . its own initiative—dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.”1 Tex. R.
App. P. 37.3(b). And here, the trial court clerk has not filed the clerk’s record because
Fletcher has failed to pay the clerk’s fee.
We notified Fletcher of this issue and warned her that we would dismiss her
appeal for want of prosecution unless she made payment arrangements for the clerk’s
record and provided us with proof of payment within ten days—by June 8, 2026. See
Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b) (authorizing dismissal for nonpayment but stating that the
appellate court “must give the appellant a reasonable opportunity to cure”), 44.3
(providing that court must not dispose of an appeal for formal defects “without
allowing a reasonable time to correct” the defects). Fletcher responded by insisting
that she had, months earlier, “tendered [to the trial court clerk a] silver surety bond
certificate for required tendered payments.” However, there is no indication that the
trial court clerk agreed to accept a “silver surety bond certificate” as a form of
payment. To the contrary, the trial court clerk has informed us that she has billed
Fletcher and still has not been paid “by cash or credit card.” See Lynn v. Ferguson, No.
This rule does not apply if “the appellant [i]s entitled to proceed without 1
payment of costs.” Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). But there is no indication that Appellant Melanie Fletcher is entitled to proceed without payment of costs.
2 02-25-00619-CV, 2026 WL 1365091, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth May 14, 2026,
pet. denied) (per curiam) (mem. op.) (holding that the appellant had not paid for the
clerk’s record when he claimed the clerk “had wrongfully rejected a money order” but
the clerk confirmed that the money order was not signed and that the appellant had
not provided other valid payment). And Fletcher’s June 8 deadline for correcting this
issue has come and gone. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 44.3.
Because Fletcher has not paid for the clerk’s record, we dismiss her appeal for
want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), 43.2(f); Lynn, 2026 WL
1365091, at *1. Her pending motions are denied.
/s/ Bonnie Sudderth
Bonnie Sudderth Chief Justice
Delivered: June 25, 2026
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Melanie Fletcher v. Larry Branch, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melanie-fletcher-v-larry-branch-txctapp2-2026.