Melanefy v. O'Driscoll
This text of 41 N.E. 654 (Melanefy v. O'Driscoll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Even if it were assumed that a widowed mother is under the same obligation to support her minor children as a father would be, an allowance may nevertheless be made to her towards such support from the estate of a child who has property; and if she herself were the guardian, such allowance might be made in the settlement of her accounts. Dawes v. Howard, 4 Mass. 97. In this instance, another person was appointed guardian; and the reasonableness of his payments to his ward’s mother may be determined on his accounting. It is a question of fact, and has been found in his favor, provided such finding was warranted upon the evidence. It was not necessary to obtain an order of court before making the payments. The amount of property of the mother is not stated. Upon the facts reported, we cannot say that the allowance was unreasonable. The appellant suggests that the mother did not originally intend to charge anything against her daughter. But this does not so appear by the report. Decree affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
41 N.E. 654, 164 Mass. 422, 1895 Mass. LEXIS 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melanefy-v-odriscoll-mass-1895.