Mel Coleman, Jr., Nicole Coleman and/or All Other Occupants 1012 Angie Lane, De Soto, TX 75115 v. Bank of America, National Association as Successor by Merger to LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee for Certificate Holders of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I LLC, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-HE7
This text of Mel Coleman, Jr., Nicole Coleman and/or All Other Occupants 1012 Angie Lane, De Soto, TX 75115 v. Bank of America, National Association as Successor by Merger to LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee for Certificate Holders of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I LLC, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-HE7 (Mel Coleman, Jr., Nicole Coleman and/or All Other Occupants 1012 Angie Lane, De Soto, TX 75115 v. Bank of America, National Association as Successor by Merger to LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee for Certificate Holders of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I LLC, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-HE7) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________
No. 06-11-00105-CV ______________________________
MEL COLEMAN, JR., NICOLE COLEMAN, AND/OR ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS 1012 ANGIE LANE, DE SOTO, TX 75115, Appellants
V.
BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR CERTIFICATE HOLDERS OF BEAR STEARNS ASSET BACKED SECURITIES I LLC, ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-HE7, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court No. CC-10-08162-A
Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. Opinion by Justice Moseley OPINION
Bank of America, National Association,1 filed a forcible detainer lawsuit in Justice of the
Peace Court of Dallas County, Precinct 4-1,2 seeking a writ of possession evicting Mel Coleman,
Jr., Nicole Coleman, and all other occupants (hereinafter the Colemans) of 1012 Angie Lane,
De Soto, Texas, 75515. When the Colemans failed to file an answer, the justice court entered a
default judgment, ordering that Bank of America “have and recover from [the Colemans] the
premises described . . . .” On November 17, 2010, the Colemans appealed the default judgment to
the Dallas County Court at Law No. 1. On July 28, 2011, the parties signed 3 and entered an
agreed judgment granting possession of the property to Bank of America. The Colemans
subsequently filed this appeal.
On appeal, the Colemans, proceeding pro se, argue that the justice court erred in entering
the default judgment because the complaint filed in the justice court failed to provide proper
notice.
We affirm the judgment because the Colemans’ argument is moot.
1 Bank of America, National Association, as successor by merger to LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee for Certificate Holders of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I LLC, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-HE7, purchased the property at a nonjudicial foreclosure sale. 2 Originally appealed to the Fifth Court of Appeals, this case was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West 2005). We are unaware of any conflict between precedent of the Fifth Court of Appeals and that of this Court on any relevant issue. See TEX. R. APP. P. 41.3. 3 The agreed judgment is not signed by the parties, but rather, is signed by counsel for Bank of America and the Colemans.
2 In their sole point of error, the Colemans contend that the justice court erred in entering the
default judgment because Bank of America’s complaint failed to provide proper notice.
Specifically, the Colemans contend that the complaint failed to sufficiently describe the property.
We need not reach the merits of the Colemans’ argument because their point of error is moot.
An appeal from a justice court judgment is tried de novo in the county court. TEX. R. CIV.
P. 574b, 749, 751. Such an appeal is, essentially, a new trial before a different judge. Searcy v.
Sagullo, 915 S.W.2d 595 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1996, no writ). Accordingly, the
Colemans’ point of error regarding the justice court’s default judgment was rendered moot by the
trial de novo before the county court at law. Because the Colemans failed to raise any point of
error regarding an act or omission by the county court at law, we must overrule the point of error
and affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Bailey C. Moseley Justice
Date Submitted: May 29, 2012 Date Decided: May 30, 3012
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mel Coleman, Jr., Nicole Coleman and/or All Other Occupants 1012 Angie Lane, De Soto, TX 75115 v. Bank of America, National Association as Successor by Merger to LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee for Certificate Holders of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I LLC, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-HE7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mel-coleman-jr-nicole-coleman-andor-all-other-occupants-1012-angie-texapp-2012.