Mekler v. Village of Spring Valley
Opinion
In three special proceedings: (1) to declare invalid and void three separate referendum petitions filed with the Village Clerk of the Village of Spring Valley, each of which petitions protested against a separate resolution adopted by the Board of Trustees of said village on December 2, 1963, approving the annexation of certain land to the village, and each of which petitions requested that the annexation resolution in question be submitted to the electors for their approval or disapproval pursuant to statute (Village Law, § 139-a); and (2) for other relief, the interveners in each such proceeding appeal from judgments of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, entered March 23, 1964 upon the court’s three separate decisions after a joint nonjury trial, which declared: (a) that the referendum petitions were invalid; (b) that the Board of Trustees of the village was not required to submit the annexation resolutions to the electors for approval or disapproval; and (c) that the annexations were in [925]*925full force and effect. Judgments affirmed, without costs. (Matter of Phillips [Hubbard], 284 N". Y. 152; Village Law, § 139-a; cf. Matter of Sinieropi, 135 N. Y. S. 2d 77, affd. 284 App. Div. 893; Matter of Cox v. Haverstraw, 40 Mise 2d 531, 534). Leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from the orders entered hereon is granted. In our opinion, questions of law have arisen which ought to be reviewed. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
20 A.D.2d 924 (Mekler v. Village of Spring Valley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.