Mejias v. State

763 So. 2d 567, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10159, 2000 WL 1114250
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 9, 2000·No. No. 3D00-242·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to the state’s proper concession, we reverse the order denying defendant’s post-conviction relief motion and remand for further proceedings. At sentencing, the court announced that defendant would be given credit for gain time earned but failed to include this provision in its order. Hence, we remand with instructions that the court enter an order consistent with its oral pronouncement.

Irrespective of whether the defendant has forfeited his gain time earned, the court can accomplish its original intention by reducing defendant’s sentence commensurately. Alternatively, if the court declines to resentence defendant in accord with the oral pronouncement defendant should be allowed to withdraw his plea.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mejias v. State, 763 So. 2d 567, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10159, 2000 WL 1114250 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

763 So. 2d 567 (Mejias v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ortega v. State
763 So. 2d 567 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)