Mejias v. Shelbourne Ocean Beach Hotel Condominiun, Inc.

78 So. 3d 17, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16995, 2011 WL 5061363
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 26, 2011
DocketNo. 3D10-2360
StatusPublished

This text of 78 So. 3d 17 (Mejias v. Shelbourne Ocean Beach Hotel Condominiun, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mejias v. Shelbourne Ocean Beach Hotel Condominiun, Inc., 78 So. 3d 17, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16995, 2011 WL 5061363 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Given that the standard of review for a motion for continuance is abuse of discretion, see Cargile-Schrage v. Schrage, 908 So.2d 528, 529 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (“[N]o judge in his right mind would have denied the continuance.”), it certainly was not an abuse of discretion for the trial court to deny a continuance in a case that had been pending for ten years.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cargile-Schrage v. Schrage
908 So. 2d 528 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 So. 3d 17, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16995, 2011 WL 5061363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mejias-v-shelbourne-ocean-beach-hotel-condominiun-inc-fladistctapp-2011.