Mejias v. Shelbourne Ocean Beach Hotel Condominiun, Inc.
78 So. 3d 17, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16995, 2011 WL 5061363
Opinion
Affirmed. Given that the standard of review for a motion for continuance is abuse of discretion, see Cargile-Schrage v. Schrage, 908 So.2d 528, 529 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (“[N]o judge in his right mind would have denied the continuance.”), it certainly was not an abuse of discretion for the trial court to deny a continuance in a case that had been pending for ten years.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mejias v. Shelbourne Ocean Beach Hotel Condominiun, Inc., 78 So. 3d 17, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16995, 2011 WL 5061363 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).
78 So. 3d 17 (Mejias v. Shelbourne Ocean Beach Hotel Condominiun, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cargile-Schrage v. Schrage
908 So. 2d 528 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)