Mejia v. Wal-Mart

Fourth Circuit

Mejia v. Wal-Mart

599 F. App'x 520

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 27, 2015·No. No. 14-2319·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Luis D. Cabrera Mejia appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion and dismissing Mejia’s employment discrimination case with prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Mejia v. Wal-Mart, No. 1:14— cv-00237-TDS-JEP, 2014 WL 5531432 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

' AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Luis D. Cabrera Mejia appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion and dismissing Mejia’s employment discrimination case with prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Mejia v. Wal-Mart, No. 1:14— cv-00237-TDS-JEP, 2014 WL 5531432 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

' AFFIRMED.

Mejia v. Wal-Mart, 599 F. App'x 520 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

599 F. App'x 520 (Mejia v. Wal-Mart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related