Mejia v. Rasberry

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 19, 2000
Docket99-11065
StatusUnpublished

This text of Mejia v. Rasberry (Mejia v. Rasberry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mejia v. Rasberry, (5th Cir. 2000).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-11065 Conference Calendar

MOSES JOE MEJIA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RASPBERRY, Lieutenant; MEDICAL STAFF, Middleton Unit; NFN UNDERWOOD, Officer; JOHN DOE #1, Officer; JOHN DOE #2; NFN HARDEN, Officer; JOHN DOE, Transit Officer,

Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:99-CV-87 -------------------- June 15, 2000

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Moses Joe Mejia, Texas prisoner # 792983, challenges the

magistrate judge’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit.

However, because Mejia has not filed a timely notice of appeal

from the magistrate judge’s February 4, 2000, judgment, this

court is without jurisdiction to consider his arguments. See

Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987); Nelson v.

Foti, 707 F.2d 170, 171 (5th Cir. 1983); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1).

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 99-11065 -2-

Mejia did file a timely notice appeal from the magistrate

judge’s denial of his motion for the appointment of counsel, and

the notice of appeal seeks review of that order only. However,

he has failed to brief any argument regarding the denial of

counsel, and the argument is therefore waived. See Yohey v.

Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). Because he has

abandoned the sole ground for appeal, Mejia’s appeal is

DISMISSED. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.

1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mejia v. Rasberry, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mejia-v-rasberry-ca5-2000.