Mejia-Gutierrez v. United States

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedSeptember 10, 1993
Docket93-1292
StatusPublished

This text of Mejia-Gutierrez v. United States (Mejia-Gutierrez v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mejia-Gutierrez v. United States, (1st Cir. 1993).

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion


September 10, 1993
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 93-1292

LUIS F. MEJIA-GUTIERREZ,

Plaintiff, Petitioner,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Respondent.

____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

[Hon. Jose Antonio Fuste, U.S. District Judge]
___________________

____________________

Before

Breyer, Chief Judge,
___________
Selya and Boudin, Circuit Judges.
______________

____________________

Luis F. Mejia-Gutierrez on brief pro se.
_______________________
Charles E. Fitzwilliam, United States Attorney, Edwin O. Vazquez,
______________________ _________________
Assistant United States Attorney, and Jose A. Quiles-Espinosa, Senior
_______________________
Litigation Counsel, on brief for appellee.

____________________

____________________

Per Curiam. On October 25, 1989, Luis Mejia-
___________

Gutierrez pled guilty to one count of bringing cocaine on

board an aircraft in violation of 21 U.S.C. 955. At

sentencing on January 25, 1990, the district court granted

Mejia-Gutierrez a two-level reduction in base offense level

for acceptance of responsibility, and sentenced him to 70

months in prison. Effective November 1, 1992, the United

States Sentencing Commission amended sentencing guideline

3E1.1 to permit an additional one-level reduction in base

offense level for persons eligible for the two-level

reduction for acceptance of responsibility. Mejia-Gutierrez

sought to reduce his sentence pursuant to the amended

guideline, claiming that the amendment should be applied

retroactively. The district court denied his request.

Because we have decided that the amendment in question is not

retroactive, see DeSouza v. United States, 995 F.2d 323, 324
___ _______ _____________

(1st Cir. 1993), we affirm the district court's denial of

Mejia-Gutierrez's request for a sentence reduction under

amended 3E1.1.

Affirmed.
________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barbara Bushway Desouza v. United States
995 F.2d 323 (First Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mejia-Gutierrez v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mejia-gutierrez-v-united-states-ca1-1993.