Mejer-Kondla v. Douglas Centre, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mejer-Kondla v. Douglas Centre, Inc.

701 So. 2d 126, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12734, 1997 WL 699731

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 12, 1997·No. No. 97-364·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Emelina Mejer-Kondla, appeals an order compelling settlement with appel-lees, Douglas Centre, Inc. and Eagleton Kathe Property, Co. We reverse, because the trial court improperly found a settlement agreement when there remained material differences regarding the essential elements of the proposed agreement. See Robbie v. City of Miami, 469 So.2d 1384 (Fla.1985); Metropolitan Dade County v. Estate of Hernandez, 591 So.2d 1124 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Theocles v. Lytras, 518 So.2d 936 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); [127] Gaines v. Nortrust Realty Management, Inc., 422 So.2d 1037 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Emelina Mejer-Kondla, appeals an order compelling settlement with appel-lees, Douglas Centre, Inc. and Eagleton Kathe Property, Co. We reverse, because the trial court improperly found a settlement agreement when there remained material differences regarding the essential elements of the proposed agreement. See Robbie v. City of Miami, 469 So.2d 1384 (Fla.1985); Metropolitan Dade County v. Estate of Hernandez, 591 So.2d 1124 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Theocles v. Lytras, 518 So.2d 936 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); [127] Gaines v. Nortrust Realty Management, Inc., 422 So.2d 1037 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Reversed and remanded.

Mejer-Kondla v. Douglas Centre, Inc., 701 So. 2d 126, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12734, 1997 WL 699731 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

701 So. 2d 126 (Mejer-Kondla v. Douglas Centre, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related