Mejer-Kondla v. Douglas Centre, Inc.

701 So. 2d 126, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12734, 1997 WL 699731
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 12, 1997
DocketNo. 97-364
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 701 So. 2d 126 (Mejer-Kondla v. Douglas Centre, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mejer-Kondla v. Douglas Centre, Inc., 701 So. 2d 126, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12734, 1997 WL 699731 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Emelina Mejer-Kondla, appeals an order compelling settlement with appel-lees, Douglas Centre, Inc. and Eagleton Kathe Property, Co. We reverse, because the trial court improperly found a settlement agreement when there remained material differences regarding the essential elements of the proposed agreement. See Robbie v. City of Miami, 469 So.2d 1384 (Fla.1985); Metropolitan Dade County v. Estate of Hernandez, 591 So.2d 1124 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Theocles v. Lytras, 518 So.2d 936 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); [127]*127Gaines v. Nortrust Realty Management, Inc., 422 So.2d 1037 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sorocka v. Severe
858 So. 2d 388 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
701 So. 2d 126, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12734, 1997 WL 699731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mejer-kondla-v-douglas-centre-inc-fladistctapp-1997.