Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Meister v. Salzman

Meister v. Salzman

52 A.D.3d 223, 857 N.Y.S.2d 907
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 3, 2008
StatusPublished

This text of 52 A.D.3d 223 (Meister v. Salzman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meister v. Salzman, 52 A.D.3d 223, 857 N.Y.S.2d 907 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter B. Tolub, J.), entered December 10, 2007, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied petitioner’s motion to seal the arbitration proceeding and its related award, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The information in the arbitration award specifically cited by petitioner does not provide a sufficient ground for sealing the proceeding (see Liapakis v Sullivan, 290 AD2d 393, 394 [2002]; Matter of Hofmann, 284 AD2d 92 [2001]). The agreement between the parties contemplated potential public disclosure of arbitration awards if a party sought to confirm an award.

We have considered petitioner’s other claims and find them without merit. Concur—Andrias, J.P, Gonzalez, Moskowitz and DeGrasse, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Estate of Hofmann
284 A.D.2d 92 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Liapakis v. Sullivan
290 A.D.2d 393 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 A.D.3d 223, 857 N.Y.S.2d 907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meister-v-salzman-nyappdiv-2008.