Meister v. Rivero
This text of 75 So. 3d 236 (Meister v. Rivero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We initially accepted jurisdiction under article V, section 3(b)(4), of the Florida Constitution to review Rivero v. Meister, 46 So.3d 1161 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010), a decision in which the Fourth District Court of Appeal certified the following question to be of great public importance:
DOES THE DEFINITION OF “BAD FAITH CONDUCT” IN MOAKLEY V. SMALLWOOD, 826 So.2d 221 (Fla. 2002), INCLUDE RECKLESS MISCONDUCT WHICH RESULTS IN THE UNNECESSARY INCUR-RENCE OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES?
Rivero, 46 So.3d at 1164. Upon further consideration, we conclude that we should exercise our discretion and decline review. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
75 So. 3d 236, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 607, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 2571, 2011 WL 5082396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meister-v-rivero-fla-2011.