Meister v. McAuliffe
This text of 237 N.E.2d 363 (Meister v. McAuliffe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel and Jasen. Judge Keating dissents and votes to reverse and deny the motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the complaint and buttressing affidavits are sufficient to present a triable issue as to whether the foreign divorce decree and rescission of the separation agreement were induced by the coercion, duress, fraud and breach of confidential relationship on the part of decedent husband (Averbuck v. Averbuck, 270 App. Div. 116; cf. Cohn v. Lionel Corp., 21 N Y 2d 559).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
237 N.E.2d 363, 21 N.Y.2d 972, 290 N.Y.S.2d 202, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meister-v-mcauliffe-ny-1968.