Meister v. McAuliffe

237 N.E.2d 363, 21 N.Y.2d 972, 290 N.Y.S.2d 202, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1455
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 11, 1968
StatusPublished

This text of 237 N.E.2d 363 (Meister v. McAuliffe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meister v. McAuliffe, 237 N.E.2d 363, 21 N.Y.2d 972, 290 N.Y.S.2d 202, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1455 (N.Y. 1968).

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel and Jasen. Judge Keating dissents and votes to reverse and deny the motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the complaint and buttressing affidavits are sufficient to present a triable issue as to whether the foreign divorce decree and rescission of the separation agreement were induced by the coercion, duress, fraud and breach of confidential relationship on the part of decedent husband (Averbuck v. Averbuck, 270 App. Div. 116; cf. Cohn v. Lionel Corp., 21 N Y 2d 559).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Averbuck v. Averbuck
270 A.D. 116 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
237 N.E.2d 363, 21 N.Y.2d 972, 290 N.Y.S.2d 202, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meister-v-mcauliffe-ny-1968.