Meister v. Commissioner
This text of 1984 T.C. Memo. 73 (Meister v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CLAPP,
FINDINGS OF FACT
Petitioner timely filed an individual income tax return for 1980. On that return he listed his occupation as tool designer. He reported wages from his employment with Sentry Design, Incorporated, and a net profit of $8,252.95 from his engineering and design*607 business. He did not report any self-employment tax.
On March 9, 1982, respondent mailed a notice of deficiency to petitioner in which respondent determined the $8,252.95 was subject to the self-employment tax. On May 19, 1982, petitioner filed a petitioner with this Court in which he alleged:
[T]he proposed "Self-Employment" tax is a direct violation of my constitutional rights as granted in Article I, sect. 8, Article I, sect. 9, Article IV, sect. 2 and amendments to the United States Constitution as follows: #1, #4, #5, #9, #10, #13, #14. I demand trial by jury under my rights as granted by the
Petitioner resided in Pontiac, Michigan, when his petition was filed.
OPINION
It is well settled that the self-employment tax is constitutional.
Footnotes
1. See
.Laurins v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1983-207↩
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1984 T.C. Memo. 73, 47 T.C.M. 1099, 1984 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meister-v-commissioner-tax-1984.