Meisle v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

168 A.D. 939

This text of 168 A.D. 939 (Meisle v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meisle v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 168 A.D. 939 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

We think there was no evidence to justify the verdict of the jury that the defendant was negligent or that it could have anticipated such an accident as occurred and which resulted in the death of the plaintiff’s intestate. The judgment is, therefore, reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.; Laughlin, J., dissented and voted for affirmance. Judgment and order reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 A.D. 939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meisle-v-new-york-central-hudson-river-railroad-nyappdiv-1915.