Meisenhelder v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Meisenhelder v. Zoning Board of Appeals

70 A.D.2d 595, 415 N.Y.S.2d 1015

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 7, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 70 A.D.2d 595 (Meisenhelder v. Zoning Board of Appeals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meisenhelder v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 70 A.D.2d 595, 415 N.Y.S.2d 1015 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Ramapo granting an application made by intervenor-respondent for a special permit and for a variance, petitioners appeal from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in Rockland County on July 28, 1978, as, upon annulling the determination, stated that the decision shall be without prejudice to a similar application for a variance based upon adequate proof. Appeal dismissed, with one bill of $50 costs and disburse[596]*596ments, payable jointly to respondents. Appellants are not aggrieved and have no cause to appeal since the determination of the zoning board has been annulled. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Titone and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Ramapo granting an application made by intervenor-respondent for a special permit and for a variance, petitioners appeal from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in Rockland County on July 28, 1978, as, upon annulling the determination, stated that the decision shall be without prejudice to a similar application for a variance based upon adequate proof. Appeal dismissed, with one bill of $50 costs and disburse[596]*596ments, payable jointly to respondents. Appellants are not aggrieved and have no cause to appeal since the determination of the zoning board has been annulled. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Titone and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 A.D.2d 595, 415 N.Y.S.2d 1015, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meisenhelder-v-zoning-board-of-appeals-nyappdiv-1979.