Meisel v. Grumberg
225 A.D.2d 495, 639 N.Y.2d 815, 639 N.Y.S.2d 815, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3272
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 28, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 225 A.D.2d 495 (Meisel v. Grumberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Meisel v. Grumberg, 225 A.D.2d 495, 639 N.Y.2d 815, 639 N.Y.S.2d 815, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3272 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
Opinion
Given defendant’s admitted failure to comply with the directive of the prior IAS Justice that the accounting conform to that required in Tarulli v Rocchio (270 App Div 1023), it was proper to hold that the submitted accounting was deficient. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Rubin, Ross and Tom, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sichel v. Polak
267 A.D.2d 123 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
225 A.D.2d 495, 639 N.Y.2d 815, 639 N.Y.S.2d 815, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meisel-v-grumberg-nyappdiv-1996.