Meira Davis v. MacuHealth Distribution, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedFebruary 5, 2020
Docket2:19-cv-01947
StatusUnknown

This text of Meira Davis v. MacuHealth Distribution, Inc. (Meira Davis v. MacuHealth Distribution, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meira Davis v. MacuHealth Distribution, Inc., (E.D. Cal. 2020).

Opinion

ZAINAH ALFI (CA State Bar No. 227460) 2 (SBN 304164) scottcommerson@dwt.com C. GENEVIEVE JENKINS ROCHELLE L. WILCOX 3 (SBN 271128) (CA State Bar No. 197790) 1000 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 600 rochellewilcox@dwt.com 4 Los Angeles, CA 90017 VALERIE N. GALLO Telephone: 213-340-0300 (CA State Bar No. 289882) 5 Fax: 213-340-0200 valeriegallo@dwt.com zalfi@excelsislaw.com DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 6 865 South Figueroa Street, 24th Floor Attorneys for Plaintiff and Los Angeles, California 90017-2566 7 Counter-Defendant Telephone: (213) 633-6800 RAQUEL MEIRA DAVIS Fax: (213) 633-6899 8 Attorneys for Defendant and 9 Counter-Claimant MACUHEALTH DISTRIBUTION, 10 INC. and Defendant FREDERIC JOUHET 11 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14 SACRAMENTO DIVISION

15 RAQUEL MEIRA DAVIS, an individual, Case No. 2:19-cv-01947-WBS-KJN Assigned to the Hon. William B. Shubb 16 Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE 17 vs. ORDER

18 MACUHEALTH DISTRIBUTION, INC.; FREDERIC JOUHET, an individual; and Action Filed: September 24, 2019 19 DOES 1-10, inclusive,

20 Defendants.

21 MACUHEALTH DISTRIBUTION, INC., 22 a corporation,

23 Counter-Claimant

24 v.

25 RAQUEL MEIRA DAVIS, an individual, and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 26 Counterclaim Defendants 27 28 I. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 2 A. Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 3 4 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 5 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may 6 be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to 7 8 enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this 9 Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 10 discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends 11 12 only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment 13 under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth 14 in Section XIII(C), below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them 15 16 to file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 141 sets forth the 17 procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a 18 party seeks permission from the Court to file material under seal. 19 20 II. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 21 A. This action is likely to involve trade secrets, customer and pricing lists 22 and other valuable research, development, commercial, financial, technical and/or 23 24 proprietary information for which special protection from public disclosure and 25 from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action is warranted. Such 26 confidential and proprietary materials and information consist of, among other 27 28 things, confidential business or financial information, information regarding confidential business practices, or other confidential research, development, or 2 commercial information (including information implicating privacy rights of third 3 4 parties), information otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or which may be 5 privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes, 6 court rules, case decisions, or common law. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of 7 8 information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of 9 discovery materials, to adequately protect information the parties are entitled to 10 keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses 11 12 of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their 13 handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a protective order 14 for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties that 15 16 information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that 17 nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a 18 confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part 19 20 of the public record of this case. 21 III. DEFINITIONS 22 A. Action: This pending federal lawsuit and any consolidated or related 23 24 actions. 25 B. Challenging Party: A Party or Non-Party that challenges the 26 designation of information or items under this Order. 27 28 C. “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: Information (regardless of 2 how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for 3 4 protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in 5 the Good Cause Statement. 6 D. “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” means any information which belongs 7 8 to a Designating Party who believes in good faith that the Disclosure of such 9 information to another Party or non-Party would create a substantial risk of serious 10 financial or other injury that cannot be avoided by less restrictive means. 11 12 E. Designating Party: A Party or Non-Party that designates information 13 or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as 14 “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL.” 15 16 F. Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as 17 their support staff). 18 G. Disclosure or Discovery Material: All items or information, regardless 19 20 of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, 21 among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced 22 or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 23 24 H. Expert: A person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 25 pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as 26 an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 27 28 I. House Counsel: Attorneys who are employees of a party to this 2 Action. House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other 3 4 outside counsel. 5 J. Non-Party: Any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, 6 or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 7 8 K. Outside Counsel of Record: Attorneys who are not employees of a 9 party to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and 10 have appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm 11 12 which has appeared on behalf of that party, and includes support staff. 13 L. Party: Any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, 14 employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their 15 16 support staffs). 17 M. Producing Party: A Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or 18 Discovery Material in this Action. 19 20 N. Professional Vendors: Persons or entities that provide litigation 21 support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or 22 demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) 23 24 and their employees and subcontractors. 25 O. Protected Material: Any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is 26 designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL.” 27 28 P. Receiving Party: A Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery 2 Material from a Producing Party. 3 4 IV. SCOPE 5 A. The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only 6 Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or 7 8 extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or 9 compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or 10 presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 11 12 B. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders 13 of the trial judge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Meira Davis v. MacuHealth Distribution, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meira-davis-v-macuhealth-distribution-inc-caed-2020.