Meinstein v. Travel Etc., Inc.
This text of 442 So. 2d 1085 (Meinstein v. Travel Etc., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
Upon consideration of appellee’s Motion for Rehearing, we withdraw the opinion of November 1, 1983, and substitute the following opinion.
We reverse the trial court’s order permitting appellee to hold over as tenant until sixty days after determination of the action upon a holding that the order appealed provided injunctive relief, see Florida Jurisprudence, Injunctions, section 32 (1981) and cases cited therein, requiring the trial court to apply Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610. While the equitable remedy is proper in this case, see Shaw Brothers Oil Co. v. Parrish, 99 So.2d 610 (Fla.1958); Knight v. Global Contact Lens, 220 So.2d 693 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969); 43A C.J.S. Injunctions § 66 (1978), we reverse because the trial court failed to require the posting of bond, Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(c), and because the order fails to specify the court’s reasons for entering the order, Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(a).
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
442 So. 2d 1085, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meinstein-v-travel-etc-inc-fladistctapp-1983.