Meinke v. Dominguez

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Meinke v. Dominguez

377 So. 2d 868, 1979 La. App. LEXIS 3286

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedNovember 8, 1979

DocketNo. 10784

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 377 So. 2d 868 (Meinke v. Dominguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meinke v. Dominguez, 377 So. 2d 868, 1979 La. App. LEXIS 3286 (La. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

REDMANN, Judge.

Plaintiffs’ nearly 14-year-old child consented to be shot with a BB gun by engaging in a “war” with defendants’ eight-year-old son. Perhaps defendants might be liable to a noncombatant stranger shot by their eight-year-old son during the “war” with BB guns defendants allowed on their premises, but they are not liable to a teenager who conducts the two-party battle with defendants’ eight-year-old son.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

REDMANN, Judge.

Plaintiffs’ nearly 14-year-old child consented to be shot with a BB gun by engaging in a “war” with defendants’ eight-year-old son. Perhaps defendants might be liable to a noncombatant stranger shot by their eight-year-old son during the “war” with BB guns defendants allowed on their premises, but they are not liable to a teenager who conducts the two-party battle with defendants’ eight-year-old son.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

377 So. 2d 868, 1979 La. App. LEXIS 3286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meinke-v-dominguez-lactapp-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack