Meinke v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Meinke v. City of Chicago

9 Ill. App. 516, 1881 Ill. App. LEXIS 195

DecidedNovember 29, 1881

StatusPublished

This text of 9 Ill. App. 516 (Meinke v. City of Chicago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meinke v. City of Chicago, 9 Ill. App. 516, 1881 Ill. App. LEXIS 195 (Ill. Ct. App. 1881).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case was submitted upon the regular call of the docket, by the counsel for the respective parties, upon printed arguments. The court being uninformed as to its actual condition upon the record, took the case for decision. Now we find that the record, or what is filed as and for a record, purports to be and is nothing more than a certified copy of a declaration in an action on the case, on file in the Superior Court of Cook County. There is no placiium, no summons, or appearance in the lower court, demurrer or judgment therein. But counsel have submitted arguments upon both sides in this court, upon the question of the sufficiency of that declaration. So that we are, in substance and effect, called upon in this case to pass upon such pleading, merely as a court of original jurisdiction. We have no such jurisdiction, and counsel cannot confer it by any agreement they may make. The case will therefore be dismissed out of this court.

W rit of error dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This case was submitted upon the regular call of the docket, by the counsel for the respective parties, upon printed arguments. The court being uninformed as to its actual condition upon the record, took the case for decision. Now we find that the record, or what is filed as and for a record, purports to be and is nothing more than a certified copy of a declaration in an action on the case, on file in the Superior Court of Cook County. There is no placiium, no summons, or appearance in the lower court, demurrer or judgment therein. But counsel have submitted arguments upon both sides in this court, upon the question of the sufficiency of that declaration. So that we are, in substance and effect, called upon in this case to pass upon such pleading, merely as a court of original jurisdiction. We have no such jurisdiction, and counsel cannot confer it by any agreement they may make. The case will therefore be dismissed out of this court.

W rit of error dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 Ill. App. 516, 1881 Ill. App. LEXIS 195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meinke-v-city-of-chicago-illappct-1881.