Meinhardt v. State

114 So. 631, 22 Ala. App. 263, 1927 Ala. App. LEXIS 169
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided November 29, 1927·No. 1 Div. 733.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appellant was indicted, tried, and convicted of the offense of violating the state quarantine laws for live stock. The jury assessed a fine of $10, and judgment of conviction was accordingly pronounced and entered.

There is no bill of exceptions; the appeal is predicated upon the record proper. So far as the judgment of conviction is concerned, the cause will be affirmed; but, as there appears no sentence of the court relative to the costs incident upon the trial of this cause, it will of necessity be remanded for proper sentence. Code 1923, § 5291.

Affirmed. Remanded for proper sentence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Meinhardt v. State, 114 So. 631, 22 Ala. App. 263, 1927 Ala. App. LEXIS 169 (Ala. Ct. App. 1927).

114 So. 631 (Meinhardt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Upshaw v. State
26 So. 2d 211 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1946)