Meinert Coal Co. v. Smith

Supreme Court of Georgia

Meinert Coal Co. v. Smith

179 S.E. 707, 180 Ga. 550, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 473

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedApril 11, 1935

DocketNo. 10410

StatusPublished

This text of 179 S.E. 707 (Meinert Coal Co. v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meinert Coal Co. v. Smith, 179 S.E. 707, 180 Ga. 550, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 473 (Ga. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Hutcheson, Justice.

“The receiver is an officer and servant of the court appointing him, is responsible to no other tribunal than a court of equity, and must in all things obey its direction.” Park’s Code, § 5483. Under the facts in the instant case, and especially as set out in the final order of court, showing a withdrawal of the main question involved, the order referred to was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Jusliecs concur. Brennan & Giles and Brackell & Brennan, for plaintiff in error. Bvins & Calhoun, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hutcheson, Justice.

“The receiver is an officer and servant of the court appointing him, is responsible to no other tribunal than a court of equity, and must in all things obey its direction.” Park’s Code, § 5483. Under the facts in the instant case, and especially as set out in the final order of court, showing a withdrawal of the main question involved, the order referred to was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Jusliecs concur. Brennan & Giles and Brackell & Brennan, for plaintiff in error. Bvins & Calhoun, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 S.E. 707, 180 Ga. 550, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meinert-coal-co-v-smith-ga-1935.