Meine v. State

515 S.W.3d 837, 2017 WL 1323898, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 287
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 11, 2017
DocketED 104395
StatusPublished

This text of 515 S.W.3d 837 (Meine v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meine v. State, 515 S.W.3d 837, 2017 WL 1323898, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 287 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Todd Meine appeals from a denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
515 S.W.3d 837, 2017 WL 1323898, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meine-v-state-moctapp-2017.