Meindl v. Meindl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Meindl v. Meindl

190 A.D.2d 1039, 595 N.Y.S.2d 340, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1249

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 5, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 190 A.D.2d 1039 (Meindl v. Meindl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meindl v. Meindl, 190 A.D.2d 1039, 595 N.Y.S.2d 340, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1249 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Defendant, a New York resident, appeals from denial of her motion to enforce a Pennsylvania divorce decree and to increase child support. Supreme Court properly held that it lacked jurisdiction over plaintiff. CPLR 302 (b) authorizes jurisdiction over nonresidents in matrimonial actions in specified circumstances. Although defendant argues that New York was the matrimonial domicile of the parties before their separation, no such proof is contained in the record. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Orleans County, Wolf, Jr., J.— Modify Support.) Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Balio, Fallon and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Defendant, a New York resident, appeals from denial of her motion to enforce a Pennsylvania divorce decree and to increase child support. Supreme Court properly held that it lacked jurisdiction over plaintiff. CPLR 302 (b) authorizes jurisdiction over nonresidents in matrimonial actions in specified circumstances. Although defendant argues that New York was the matrimonial domicile of the parties before their separation, no such proof is contained in the record. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Orleans County, Wolf, Jr., J.— Modify Support.) Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Balio, Fallon and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 A.D.2d 1039, 595 N.Y.S.2d 340, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meindl-v-meindl-nyappdiv-1993.