Meimann v. Le Bowski

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Meimann v. Le Bowski

107 N.Y.S. 1137

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided November 29, 1907·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This action is predicated upon a verified complaint setting forth in substance that the defendant received from one Nosser the sum of $110, witich the defendant promised to repay to him, and that before this action had been commenced he had duly assigned the claim for value to the plaintiff. The plaintiff had a judgment for the sum of $71.70 damages, besides costs. Neither the existence of any debt nor the assignment of any claim was shown upon the trial. The judgment rendered is without evidence to support it. Judgment reversed, with costs, and new trial ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This action is predicated upon a verified complaint setting forth in substance that the defendant received from one Nosser the sum of $110, witich the defendant promised to repay to him, and that before this action had been commenced he had duly assigned the claim for value to the plaintiff. The plaintiff had a judgment for the sum of $71.70 damages, besides costs. Neither the existence of any debt nor the assignment of any claim was shown upon the trial. The judgment rendered is without evidence to support it. Judgment reversed, with costs, and new trial ordered.

Meimann v. Le Bowski, 107 N.Y.S. 1137 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

107 N.Y.S. 1137 (Meimann v. Le Bowski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.