Meiliken v. Hart
This text of 261 A.D.2d 370 (Meiliken v. Hart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), entered October 26, 1998, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion to compel disclosure.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the Supreme Court that the statement of the defendant Patricia Hart to the defendants’ insurance carrier is not privileged from disclosure (see, CPLR 3101 [g]; Agovino v Taco Bell 5083, 225 AD2d 569). Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
261 A.D.2d 370, 687 N.Y.S.2d 290, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meiliken-v-hart-nyappdiv-1999.