Meiliken v. Hart

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Meiliken v. Hart

261 A.D.2d 370, 687 N.Y.S.2d 290, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4530

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 3, 1999·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), entered October 26, 1998, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion to compel disclosure.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the statement of the defendant Patricia Hart to the defendants’ insurance carrier is not privileged from disclosure (see, CPLR 3101 [g]; Agovino v Taco Bell 5083, 225 AD2d 569). Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), entered October 26, 1998, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion to compel disclosure.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the statement of the defendant Patricia Hart to the defendants’ insurance carrier is not privileged from disclosure (see, CPLR 3101 [g]; Agovino v Taco Bell 5083, 225 AD2d 569). Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Meiliken v. Hart, 261 A.D.2d 370, 687 N.Y.S.2d 290, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4530 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

261 A.D.2d 370 (Meiliken v. Hart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related