Meijer Inc v. Attorney Discipline Board
This text of Meijer Inc v. Attorney Discipline Board (Meijer Inc v. Attorney Discipline Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
October 2, 2013 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman 147543 & (3) Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano, MEIJER, INC., Justices Plaintiff, v SC: 147543 ADB: 13-000032-GA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD, Defendant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the motion for leave to file a brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. October 2, 2013 s0925 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Meijer Inc v. Attorney Discipline Board, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meijer-inc-v-attorney-discipline-board-mich-2013.