Meigs v. London Assur. Co.

Third Circuit

Meigs v. London Assur. Co.

134 F. 1021, 68 C.C.A. 249, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4296

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedFebruary 3, 1905

DocketNo. 15

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 134 F. 1021 (Meigs v. London Assur. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meigs v. London Assur. Co., 134 F. 1021, 68 C.C.A. 249, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4296 (3d Cir. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

DALLAS, Circuit Judge.

The able argument which has been submitted on behalf of the plaintiff in error has had our careful attention, but it has failed to convince us that any error was committed by the Circuit Court in its decision of this case. The learned judge carefully considered it in an-opinion which, we think, completely vindicated his conclusion. 126 Fed. 781. Upon that opinion, therefore, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DALLAS, Circuit Judge.

The able argument which has been submitted on behalf of the plaintiff in error has had our careful attention, but it has failed to convince us that any error was committed by the Circuit Court in its decision of this case. The learned judge carefully considered it in an-opinion which, we think, completely vindicated his conclusion. 126 Fed. 781. Upon that opinion, therefore, the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 F. 1021, 68 C.C.A. 249, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meigs-v-london-assur-co-ca3-1905.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack