Meigs v. London Assur. Co.

Third Circuit

Meigs v. London Assur. Co.

134 F. 1021, 68 C.C.A. 249, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4296

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided February 3, 1905·No. No. 15·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DALLAS, Circuit Judge.

The able argument which has been submitted on behalf of the plaintiff in error has had our careful attention, but it has failed to convince us that any error was committed by the Circuit Court in its decision of this case. The learned judge carefully considered it in an-opinion which, we think, completely vindicated his conclusion. 126 Fed. 781. Upon that opinion, therefore, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DALLAS, Circuit Judge.

The able argument which has been submitted on behalf of the plaintiff in error has had our careful attention, but it has failed to convince us that any error was committed by the Circuit Court in its decision of this case. The learned judge carefully considered it in an-opinion which, we think, completely vindicated his conclusion. 126 Fed. 781. Upon that opinion, therefore, the judgment is affirmed.

Meigs v. London Assur. Co., 134 F. 1021, 68 C.C.A. 249, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4296 (3d Cir. 1905).

Pincite

134 F. 1021 (Meigs v. London Assur. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related